Transparent Path’s Shipment Dashboard
Project Overview
Synopsis:
What: Our team of 3 had 3 weeks to design the first version of Transparent Path’s dashboard for tracking food shipments.
Business Problem:
What: Allow chocolatiers a way to track and see the temperature and humidity status of their chocolate shipments.
Why: Chocolate melts if it gets too hot and can get sugarbloom (unappealing chocolate textures) if it is exposed to too much humidity. Chocolatiers and other food supply chain users want to ensure their shipments arrive unaffected to their destination.
Roles:
My Role: Lead UX Researcher
Purpose:
Identify the feelings, moods, expectations, and pain points for different users along the chocolate supply chain.
Provide design insights for our designers to build a user friendly mockup for this shipment tracking software.
Other Members:
Jordan Kulhawik: Lead Visual Designer
Harris McNeil: Project Manager & Information Architect
Process:
What: Used the agile approach to design a Figma prototype that allows supply chain users to track shipments and resolve shipments with warnings or risks.
Why: To provide frequent feedback to create effective designs that address the root problems of the customer.
Top methods used:
Design Studio
Wireframes
Prototyping
User Journeys
Concept Maps
Personas
Interviews
Usability Testing
System Usability Scores
Competitive Analysis
User Flows
Affinity Mapping
Hypothesis:
What: Chocolatiers don’t have a way to know if their chocolate shipment arrives to their destination without melting or spoiling.
Why: Chocolatiers currently send off their shipment and can only see if their shipment has arrived to the destination, not the status of the shipment. There is brand image risk involved if something happens to the shipment along the route to the destination.
Solution:
What: Using trackers attached to shipment containers to track humidity and temperature, a dashboard that shows these shipment statuses allow the chocolatier to take action before a damaged product arrives to its destination.
Why: This allows chocolatiers to stop or investigate potential damaged products before it reaches the destination. This protects the brand image of the chocolatier and mitigates risk of recall costs.
Research
Interviews:
What: I created the user research plan to focus on:
User expectations
What did chocolatiers expect to see when tracking their chocolate shipments.
Moods & feelings
What frustrated and delighted chocolatiers when shipping and receiving their chocolate supplies.
Walkthrough of receiving and sending chocolate supply shipments
Understanding inefficiencies and painpoints in the chocolate supply chain.
Why: To provide insight on:
Chocolatier’s true painpoints
Opportunities for improvement
Due to the coronavirus situation during this time, all interviews with chocolatiers were remote and methods such as contextual inquiry at a chocolate factory were not feasible.
Defining the Problem & Solution
Understanding the User’s values and User Journey:
What: By mapping out the user flow and our users values, our team could understand the user journey for a chocolatier.
Why: This allows us to understand our user and identify what are the areas of improvement our solution can assist with to make our user’s life that much better.
Our target persona was Mario Chessa:
Chocolatier - Processes and makes fine chocolates
Concerned on upholding a reliable brand image
Wants to solve shipment issues before they are too late and cost him a lot of money
User Problem:
Mario’s issue:
Currently has no way of tracking shipments once they get sent off.
Faced a previous upset customer since the chocolate shipment melted before arrival, costing thousands of dollars.
Solution:
Transparent Path’s shipment tracker:
Allows chocolatiers to know which shipments are late, at risk of melting, or have any other early warnings.
Allow chocolatiers to contact truckers to check and resolve shipment risks.
Some interesting insights & findings:
I wanted to ensure that our insights allowed our client to know:
What findings reinforced functions they already were planning to include in the product
What additional user needs were not yet met in the product
Visual Design
Design Studio
My team conducted 5 minute design studio exercises to sketch potential design layouts based on:
Our understanding of the problem
Inspiration from competitor research
Sketches:
Using our design studio, we identified:
The key themes & functions to incorporate into our design
Wireframes:
Using our sketches and user flows, our team created wireframes:
To show how our users interact with our system
Mockup/Prototype:
Our team created mockups and I created a prototype for usability testing.
Our goal:
Incorporate a lot of shipping details needed by users in an organized and easy to understand format
User friendly design without needing to teach users how to use the software
Usability Testing & Iterations
Usability Testing:
I created our usability test plan that outlined:
What our purpose was
What user tasks we wanted to test
How we wanted to approach the usability test
Using the prototype I created, I could:
Begin testing with users
Give our team design insights on what to change for each iteration and why.
Iterations:
Using the insights from usability testing, I could recommend to my team what design improvements we could make to enhance the chocolatier’s experience.
Iteration 2:
Excursion and warning settings
Users found the old design hard to read & text heavy. This caused confusion on the difference between Max temp and max temp warning.
The thermometer affordance showed the difference between warnings and max temps.
Iteration 1:
Route visualization
Users found the old design hard to identify what warnings were present on the shipment
Users had difficulty identifying where the shipment was currently located.
Iteration 3:
Save successful confirmation
The old design did not include a way for users to know if a save went through
Having a confirmation allowed the user to receive feedback that the save action worked.
Iteration 4:
Export Data icon
Different users used different screen sizes
Some screens were too small where users mistook the old export data icon as a show further details icon
Final Prototype & Next Steps
Final Prototype:
Going through our iterations provided our team with our final prototype design for tracking shipment status on Transparent Path’s upcoming product.
System Usability Scores:
Usability Scores from SUS surveys.
To compare how much we improve our design on each iteration,
I conducted:
System Usability Score surveys with interviewees and chocolatiers
Based on initial impressions of the design.
Our system usability score (SUS) was 78.33 or a B+
The usability score we got showed us that:
We removed any issues where a user could get stuck in our usability tests
Our design had a continuous flow for the usability tasks.
Showed our team was on the right track to a user friendly design.
Next Steps:
As my team and I were given the opportunity to carry out more designs for Transparent Path, we plan to work on the following for next steps:
Conduct further usability tests
In order to:
Get more quantitative data points
Identify more potential user pain points that can be addressed.
Develop high fidelity mockups
This will provide additional design requirements for engineers including color
Conduct further research on specific functionality
For example, we learned from a chocolatier that the recall scenario involves a lot more information that needs to be included on our dashboard due to the severity of the situation.
We would like to conduct further research on what information is needed by users for a recall scenario.
Develop further pages for the dashboard
Example: Custody page, Items page, Certifications page, etc
This will flesh out the software for our users needs
Develop mobile mockups
Our team wanted to ensure our design was mobile friendly
We want to provide mobile mockups for when Transparent Path wants to shift from being desktop exclusive to a mobile platform for supply chain users on the ground with ipads and smartphones